Four Multi-GPU Z77 Boards from $280-$350 - PLX PEX 8747 featuring Gigabyte, ASRock, ECS and EVGA
by Ian Cutress on August 22, 2012 9:15 AM ESTConclusion: ECS Z77H2-AX
The ECS Z77H2-AX comes straight out of the box in a bedazzling gold sheen. If you want a gold colored motherboard and do not feel like spray painting heatsinks and capacitors yourself, then the ECS Z77H2-AX has you covered. It is just a shame that the rest of the package does not live up to that expectation.
If we start from the top, we have a PLX PEX 8747 motherboard that is retailing at the time of writing on Newegg for $310. The ECS Z77H2-AX offers something a little different than the other motherboards such that instead of having four full-length PCIe slots for multiple GPU action, ECS have gone down to three (which takes it away from a very small minority of users) and thus x16/x8/x8 connectivity. With this setup, we get space between the first and second full sized GPU, or space for two three-slot GPUs in an x16/x16 configuration.
On board we get built in WiFi and Bluetooth, as well as an mSATA port and the first motherboard in our Z77 reviews to use a Texas Instruments branded USB 3.0 controller. Unfortunately, the buck stops there.
The system uses only six of the twelve USB 2.0 ports supported by the chipset, and only six USB 3.0 total compared to other motherboards in this review that offer up to twelve USB 3.0. We have access to six SATA ports on board and an mSATA, where ECS decide to leave one of the SATA ports supported by the chipset unconnected. To save costs we have a Realtek combination of NIC and Audio, but even then we only get the ALC892 audio rather than the ALC898. The ECS Z77H2-AX has only one NIC, rather than the other motherboards in this review which have two each. For video outputs, we get VGA and HDMI, which remove the use of any display above 1920x1200 due to Ivy Bridge limitations.
In terms of performance, ECS have decided not to go down the MultiCore Enhancement route. It goes a little further than that, in the sense that our multithreaded testing on the ECS Z77H2-AX seemed a little sluggish compared to some other boards. It should also be noted that our USB 2.0 sequential testing resulted in a 20% speed loss compared to every other Z77 motherboard we have ever tested. For our real world copy test this meant an increase from 60 seconds to 75 seconds.
Overclocking was a little unusual, with the motherboard offering its own interpretation of Load Line Calibration causing a positive bias on the CPU voltage when at load by as much as 0.075 volts. Nevertheless we did hit 4.7 GHz with ease. Memory on the other hand was a little tricky to navigate, with the motherboard refusing our XMP setting or any attempt to set XMP timings. In the end, we settled for testing on 2133 10-12-12 rather than 2400 9-11-11.
The BIOS needs a little work, particularly to correct the ClearCMOS issue and resetting to defaults, as well as adjusting the SATA configuration from IDE to AHCI by default. Also, the BIOS seems to manipulate the video output of the GPUs to the physically lowest card plugged in, which is also an unusual situation. We also cannot update the BIOS through the BIOS.
The software also needs polish, with the Live Update on the drivers and utilities not working properly. The one redeeming feature despite the lack of fan headers on board is the use of hysteresis on the fan header control, which I rather like.
For $310, the ECS Z77H2-AX is way out of its league. My gut feeling is that ECS have overpaid for the PLX chip, or are thinking that a lick of gold paint can bring in the big money. Even if it was brought down to $250, it would be a hard sell. In comparison to the Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H which retails at $180, the Gigabyte board runs rings around the ECS in functionality and benchmarks. Anyone that wants to argue otherwise has not compared the two.
24 Comments
View All Comments
ultimatex - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link
I got this MOBO from Newegg the first day they had it available , I couldn't believe the price since it offered 8x8x8x8x , Picked it up the first day and havent looked back. Doesnt look as cool as the Asrock extreme9 but it still looks good. Awesome Job Gygabyte , Anandtech should have given them a Gold not bronze though since the fan issue is a minor issue.Arbie - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link
For gaming, at least, how many people are really going to build a 2xGPU system? Let alone 3x or 4x. The are so few PC games that can use anything more than one strong card AND are worth playing for more than 10 minutes. I actually don't know of any such games, but tastes differ. And some folks will have multi-monitor setups, and possibly need two cards. But overall I'd think the target audience for these mobos is extremely small.Maybe for scientific computing?
Belard - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link
Yep.... considering that most AAA PC games are just ports from consoles... having 3-4 GPUs is pointless. The returns get worse after the first 2 cards.Only those with 2~6 monitors can benefit with 2-3 cards.
Also, even $80 Gigabyte boards will do 8x x 8x SLI/CF just fine.
But hey, someone wants to spend $300 on a board... more power to them.
cmdrdredd - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link
"Only those with 2~6 monitors can benefit with 2-3 cards."Oh really? 2560x1440 on a single card is garbage in my view. I am not happy with 50fps average.
rarson - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link
If you're going multi-GPU on a single monitor, you're wasting money.Sabresiberian - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link
Because everyone should build to your standards, O god of all things computer.Do some reading; get a clue.
Steveymoo - Thursday, August 23, 2012 - link
Incorrect.If you have a 120hz monitor, 2 GPUs make a tonne of difference. Before you come back with a "no one can see 120hz" jibe. That is also incorrect.... My eyes have orgasms every once in a while when you get those ultra detail 100+ fps moments in battlefield, that look great!
von Krupp - Friday, August 24, 2012 - link
No. Metro 2033 is not happy at 2560x1440 with just a single HD 7970, and neither are Battlefield 3 or Crysis. The Total War series also crawls at maximum settings.I bought the U2711 specifically to take advantage of two cards (and for accurate colours, mind you). I have a distaste for multi-monitor gaming and will continue to have such as long as they keep making bezels on monitors.
So please, don't go claiming that multi-card is useless on a single monitor because that just isn't true.
swing848 - Monday, December 8, 2014 - link
At this date, December 2014, with maximum eye candy turned on, there are games that drop a refrence AMD R9 290 below 60 fps on a single monitor at 1920x1080 [using an Intel i5-3570K at 4GHz to 4.2GHz]Sabresiberian - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link
This is not 1998, there are many games built for the PC only, and even previously console-oriented publishers aren't just making ports for the PC, they are developing their games to take advantage of the goodness only PCs can bring to the table. Despite what console fanboys continue to spew, PC gaming is on the rise, and console gaming is on the relative decline.